Child Custody & Time-Sharing
Parenting plans and schedules under Florida’s 2023 equal time-sharing presumption, plus enforcement when an order is ignored.
Read more →Fla. Stat. § 61.14 · Modification of support and orders
A final judgment is not necessarily permanent. When circumstances change substantially, Florida law allows time-sharing, child support, and most forms of alimony to be revisited.
Courts do not reopen final judgments lightly. For most modifications, the moving party must show a change in circumstances that is substantial and material, and that the requested change serves the child’s best interest or is otherwise justified.
For time-sharing specifically, the 2023 legislation removed the long-standing requirement that the change also be unanticipated. That lowered the bar meaningfully. A change that both parents could have foreseen at the time of the original order may now support modification, where previously it would not have.
What still will not work: dissatisfaction with the original deal, a single bad month, or a change you created yourself in order to justify the request.
When income drops, the instinct is to start paying what is affordable rather than what the order requires. Florida does not work that way. Child support can generally be modified only back to the date the petition is filed, so every month before filing accrues arrears at the old rate. Those arrears are a judgment, and they survive both bankruptcy and any later agreement between the parents.
The same logic applies in reverse. If the other parent’s income has risen substantially, support does not adjust on its own. Someone has to ask.
Durational and rehabilitative alimony may be modified on a substantial, material, involuntary, and permanent change in circumstances. Bridge-the-gap alimony cannot be modified. Support also terminates on remarriage or death, and may be reduced or ended where the recipient is in a supportive relationship.
Note the word involuntary. A payer who takes a lower-paying job by choice, or retires early without a legitimate basis, will generally have income imputed at the prior level.
Parents frequently reach a new arrangement informally and simply start following it. Years later, one of them enforces the old written order, and the informal deal, however long it lasted, may not protect the other.
If you agree on a change, put it in writing and have the court enter it. An agreed modification is inexpensive and takes little time. Reconstructing an undocumented arrangement after a dispute is neither.
Questions we hear every week
There is no single number, though a change producing at least a 15 percent or $50 difference in the guideline amount is a common benchmark for a substantial change. The change also has to be involuntary and expected to continue.
You can agree, but until the court enters the agreement as an order, the original order is what is enforceable. Informal arrangements hold until they do not, which is the reason to have the agreement entered as an order.
In one respect, yes. The requirement that a change be unanticipated was removed, so a foreseeable change may now support modification. The change must still be substantial and material, and the modification must still serve the child’s best interest.
No. Support and time-sharing are enforced separately. Withholding support will put you in contempt and will not help your time-sharing claim. File a motion to enforce the parenting plan instead.
An agreed modification can be entered in a matter of weeks. A contested one follows much the same path as the original case, through discovery, mediation, and a hearing, and commonly takes several months.
Parenting plans and schedules under Florida’s 2023 equal time-sharing presumption, plus enforcement when an order is ignored.
Read more →Guideline calculations, imputed income, enforcement, and modification when your circumstances change.
Read more →Spousal support after Florida’s 2023 reform, which ended permanent alimony and capped durational awards.
Read more →The first consultation is free. Call and talk directly with an attorney who has handled these cases in the Second Judicial Circuit of Florida for 23 years.